Bitcoin TLDR

#58

newsletter icon

Summary

Dec 9 - Dec 15, 2024

Our weekly newsletter is focused on keeping you updated on what's new in Bitcoin, and summarizes the bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev and delving bitcoin mailing lists

Recent discussions within the Bitcoin community highlight significant advancements and proposals aimed at enhancing the network's security and user experience. Weikeng Chen emphasizes the benefits of implementing an "OP_SUCCESS" opcode in Bitcoin script, simplifying the development of fraud proofs by marking script execution as successful upon its activation, a move supported by the utility outlined in Rusty Russell's article on scriptPubkeys (source). In parallel, Bitcoin Error Log, under the pseudonym John Carvalho, proposes a significant shift in Bitcoin's unit representation to simplify transactions and enhance the user experience by treating the smallest indivisible unit as "one bitcoin," aiming to eliminate confusion and simplify mental arithmetic (source).

Matt Corallo introduces a discussion on the robustness of Bitcoin's signature scheme against quantum computing threats, advocating for the adoption of hash-based signatures like SPHINCS/SPHINCS+ to secure the network in the post-quantum era. This approach leverages taproot to build a scheme providing security without immediate action from wallet developers or users, despite the acknowledged potential threats quantum computing poses (source). Concurrently, an identified vulnerability in older versions of major Lightning Network implementations underscores the ongoing challenge of securing offchain contract protocols against potential exploits, with updates released to mitigate risks associated with transaction fee manipulation (source).

Lastly, QbitsCode's proposal for integrating Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) into Bitcoin Core addresses the imminent threats posed by quantum computing advancements. By incorporating core PQC algorithms like Kyber, FrodoKEM, and NTRU, this initiative aims to ensure the long-term security of Bitcoin against sophisticated quantum attacks, reflecting a proactive approach to maintaining the cryptocurrency's resilience (source).

Active Discussions

Adding New BIP Editors

99 replies

By Murch

Involving Ava Chow, Michael Folkson+34 others

calendar icon

Original post on February 27, 2024 18:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 10, 2024 22:37 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • Antoine Riard proposes significant updates to the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal process.

  • Changes include simplifying status values, reclassifying BIP types, and enhancing documentation.

  • The proposal introduces Process BIPs as living documents and redefines the role of BIP Editors.

Covenants Support - Bitcoin Wiki

7 replies

By Anthony Towns

Involving /dev /fd0, Brandon Black+2 others

calendar icon

Original post on November 29, 2024 14:08 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 11, 2024 15:11 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • The email discusses concerns over Bitcoin consensus processes, citing SegWit and BIP 16/17.

  • It criticizes the lack of a clear methodology for achieving consensus and calls for unanimous support.

  • The author highlights inadequacies in proposal vetting and the importance of rigorous testing.

Proposal for Quantum-Resistant Cryptography in Bitcoin - BIP Submission

2 replies

By Ian Quantum

Involving Agustin Cruz, Jon Atack

calendar icon

Original post on October 17, 2024 22:54 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 13, 2024 02:07 UTC

bitcoin-dev

  • FALCON's security concerns arise from input parameter randomness, contrasting NTRU Prime's resilience.

  • Quantum computing advancements threaten current cryptographic standards, necessitating quantum-resistant solutions.

  • The push for quantum-resistant cryptographic standards is crucial for securing digital assets against quantum threats.

Great Consensus Cleanup Revival

60 replies

By zawy

Involving AntoineP, ajtowns+10 others

calendar icon

Original post on March 24, 2024 19:53 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 7, 2025 15:24 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • MTP's reliability for PoW timestamps is questioned, affecting its usage.

  • Peter Todd's 2016 observation challenges MTP's dependability for timestamping.

  • OpenTimestamps avoids MTP, emphasizing the need for reliable blockchain mechanisms.

PPLNS with job declaration

42 replies

By sjors

Involving Fi3, marathon-gary+2 others

calendar icon

Original post on August 28, 2024 14:21 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 9, 2025 11:16 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • Miners could secure block rewards by proposing fake templates with high fees.

  • A verification process is suggested to exclude unfeasible transactions from templates.

  • Capping fees for all slices is proposed to discourage the creation of fake templates.

CTV, APO, CAT activity on signet

12 replies

By ajtowns

Involving fiatjaf, 1440000bytes+3 others

calendar icon

Original post on November 14, 2024 17:34 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on January 3, 2025 08:27 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The inadequacy of certain metrics overlooks ctv-signet's value, extensively reviewed in 2022.

  • Signet facilitated genuine experimentation, supporting projects like Babylon with 60,000 inscriptions.

  • Critiques include failing to capture specific transaction scripts, underscoring signet's testing importance.

op_CAT vs op_CTV vs XMR

1 reply

By HubertusVIE

Involving securitybrahh

calendar icon

Original post on December 3, 2024 10:46 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 30, 2024 15:15 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The discussion addresses Bitcoin's challenge of becoming a viable currency, focusing on economic hurdles.

  • A proposed solution involves implementing a Bitcoin-based Chaumian ecash layer to ensure fungibility.

  • An ongoing series explores these concepts further, available at a provided link for deeper insight.

Full Disclosure: “Transaction-Relay Throughput Overflow attacks against Off-Chain Protocols

1 reply

By ariard

calendar icon

Original post on December 5, 2024 17:55 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 9, 2024 15:11 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The text discusses CVE-2024-55563, a recognized cybersecurity vulnerability.

  • CVE-2024-55563's identification facilitates analysis and mitigation efforts.

  • It underscores the vulnerability's significance in cybersecurity and IT sectors.

Optimistic ZK verification using MATT

1 reply

By AdamISZ

Involving halseth

calendar icon

Original post on July 31, 2024 12:54 UTC

cyclic icon

Last reply on December 16, 2024 13:14 UTC

delvingbitcoin

  • The inquiry explores the importance of OP_CAT and covenants in blockchain technology.

  • It seeks clarification on their roles in a fraud-proof model, indicating a base understanding.

  • The discussion involves security mechanisms in cryptography, focusing on new feature integration.

Bitcoin Logo

TLDR

Join Our Newsletter

We’ll email you summaries of the latest discussions from authoritative bitcoin sources, like bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev, and Delving Bitcoin.

Explore all Products

ChatBTC imageBitcoin searchBitcoin TranscriptsSaving SatoshiBitcoin Transcripts Review
Built with 🧡 by the Bitcoin Dev Project
View our public visitor count

We'd love to hear your feedback on this project?

Give Feedback